testing positive for a banned substance.

"I take full responsibility for taking an over-the-counter product that is banned by the NCAA, " Robertson said in a statement released Monday. "I am paying a heavy price for a really bad decision, as I will never again wear an Iowa State uniform. I hope my example will serve as a warning to others contemplating use of diet supplements. "

Related image

Statements like these are leading to an unnecessary hysteria among lots of people regarding dietary supplements. Within Mr. Robertson's quote, specifically notice the term "dietary supplements". Stanozolol Cycle Dietary supplement is a very broad term, it covers literally thousands of different types of products. There is merely one kind of health supplement that will cause a positive result for steroid tests. These supplements are called pro-hormones. Did a pro-hormone cause Mr. Robertson's positive result? Possibly, but we will never know the truth.

Pro-hormones are being used to raise the human body's testosterone levels, just like steroids, but at a much lesser effect. Any kind of athlete who requires a pro-hormone knows what it really does. They already know pro-hormones are designed to elevate testosterone resulting it more muscle mass and greater athletic performance. Upon top of that, pro-hormones say directly on the container something to the result of "Professional and novice athletes subject to performance improving substance testing should check with with their sanctioning body before using this product as use of such could cause a reactive drug test. " Fairly clear isn't it? A person can't tell me that Mr. Robertson can't read, he is "an academic all-Big 12 performer who was of the same quality in the classroom as he was on the field, inches according to his coach Dan McCarney.

Blaming a positive test on one of these products may be true because they can result in a positive on a steroid test. However, it would also be very easy to blame a positive test on a dietary health supplement when they athlete was actually utilizing a steroid. Because the actual supplements are seldom made public, it is simple to blame an optimistic test on a dietary supplement.

Keep in mind that make a difference because a positive test is a positive test, right? Wrong. By these sportsmen blaming their positive test on dietary supplements rather than steroids they are in effect "passing the buck" That is, they are claiming ignorance, rather than taking responsibility, and they are hurting the multi-billion money dietary supplement industry in the process. This is not okay, not only because it creates false beliefs among the list of public about supplements, but additionally because it gives the government government reasons to further restrict what you can purchase without a prescription.

Would you like to have to go to your doctor to get a prescription for a multi-vitamin? What if you desired to buy a proteins supplement? Would you want to have to attend your doctor for that? We didn't think so. These types of athletes and their organizations are being extremely irresponsible by using broad conditions like dietary supplements when describing positive drug tests.

The NCAA and other governing organizations should need to reveal what exact material these athletes are testing positive for. By not doing so these organizations are allowing athletes to save face at the expense of an entire multi-billion buck industry. By forcing the NCAA and other regulating bodies to name the precise substance that was analyzed positive for they would eliminate all confusion on what is and is also not the cause of positive tests. Either that or governing bodies including the NCAA and the press should be educated in the proper terminology of the dietary supplement industry. Painting reactive tests with the term "dietary supplements" is inaccurate, unfair and irresponsible.

Take for example Rafael Palmeiro, everyone remembers his overly compelling capital hill testimony. How satrical that only a couple of weeks later Rafael tested positive for Stanozolol, a steroid. Palmeiro tried hard to move the blame. He held responsible "tainted" dietary supplements, and when that didn't fly he blamed a supplement B12 shot. Well stanozol is a very specific and popular steroid. Right now there is no possible way that a positive for stanazolol can be from health supplements or B12. Right after people started realizing this, Palmeiro started claiming lack of knowledge, saying he never knowingly took steroids. Well I actually guess Rafael will be making a good dwelling after baseball considering he is the only person on earth that knows where to find pills that jump off the stand into your mouth on their own. Exactly what a cool idea, the little azure pill could be come the little blue jumping pill. That would be neat to see.